Search for: "EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:04 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 16-2132, 2017 U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
And in EEOC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:06 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:47 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., case. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
On October 2nd, the Supreme Court granted cert. in a Title VII religious accommodation case, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Region 10 Education Service Center).Associational discrimination – disability. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 8:43 am
United Parcel Service, 86 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1996). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 8:43 am
United Parcel Service, 86 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1996). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
United Parcel Service, 12-1226, involves a UPS employee who was not permitted to return to work when pregnant because her doctor said she should not lift objects over twenty pounds. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. suggested that the answer is yes. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Well, Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
United Parcel Service, No. 08-60448 (5th Cir. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:12 am
United Parcel Service, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), but the ADA’s protections are less clear. [read post]
