Search for: "EPA v. Pollution Control Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
The Appeals Board called on EPA to address the issue of CO2 and other greenhouse gases being pollutants governed by the CAA. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) avoided the key question of whether carbon dioxide (CO2) is currently "subject to regulation" under the Clean Air Act (Act). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:00 am
On November 9, 2011, the Water Pollution Control Board issued new regulations, for confined feeding operations in Indiana. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
For instance, the California Health and Safety Code provides California air districts with authority to regulate air pollutants, including the option to adopt stricter emission limits than those set by both EPA and the California Air Resources Board. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:04 pm
EPA. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
EPA (limiting the scope of EPA’s authority over “waters of the United States,” and eliminating federal authority over many wetlands); Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:25 pm
Today, the Water Pollution Control Board approved new CFO regulations, which will go into effect on July 1, 2012.The new regulations contain a number of changes to how Indiana's medium and large livestock farms will be operated. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:23 pm
In yesterday's decision in Environmental Defense v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
EPA's Environmental Appeals Board. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
In October, Indiana's Air Pollution Control board set a goal of a 66 percent reduction in mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Title II creates a national regime to control air pollutants emitted from motor vehicles and expressly preempts all state emissions controls with just one exception. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
It’s not safe for a polluter to trust a subsequent owner to clean up contamination, even if the polluter has specifically paid for the cleanup, and even if the new owner signs a contract relieving the original polluter of liability. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
One requires as a condition of receiving a permit that a plant or other source of air pollution be designed to have the "best available control technology" for minimizing pollution emitted by the plant. 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:46 pm
However, the Environmental Review Board left the window open. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:49 pm
EPA, the Supreme Court held that CO2 is an “air pollutant” under the CAA. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:55 am
SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office is requesting public nominations for technical experts to augment the SAB’s Radiatio [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:55 am
SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office is requesting public nominations for technical experts to augment the SAB’s Radiatio [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
EPA disagreed and required the plant to add more stringent pollution controls. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
No enforcement proceedings were commenced by either the federal EPA or the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board upon receipt of Plaintiff’s 60-Day Notice. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am
" <> Coal River Energy, LLC v. [read post]
