Search for: "Early v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 11,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 5:59 am
” In the 1958 case of Trop v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
The vertical line represents Vice Chancellor Laster’s controversial decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, the record so far does not favor the administration. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 2:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 12:24 pm
However, an early election may be triggered as early as the Liberal Party announces their new leader on Sunday, March 9. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 10:10 am
" As an amicus, I told a federal judge that Morrison v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:18 am
How Long Does it Take to Subpoena Phone Records? [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:05 am
First was Biden v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 6:46 am
Proactive law schools anticipated changes to the racial and ethnic makeups of their classes ahead of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 6:46 am
Proactive law schools anticipated changes to the racial and ethnic makeups of their classes ahead of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Because of its short timeline, the CRA has teeth only when three criteria are satisfied: (1) there’s a change in presidential administration, (2) the new President’s agenda has the support of both houses of Congress, and (3) the prior administration either (a) failed to promulgate important regulations early enough to avoid the 60-day dragnet or (b) failed to submit the regulation to Congress. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 10:37 am
FCC and Fox Television Stations v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 9:40 am
Today the Court decided one case, San Francisco v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
Does our review of the statutory roles and responsibilities of the department TJAGs answer the question of whether Secretary Hegseth’s actions were unprecedented? [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:42 pm
How does a gallery closure impact artists? [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:28 pm
The USSG then detail options (see Chapter V of the USSG Manual). [read post]
