Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
New York (1968), which upheld a ban on selling sexually themed material to minors, and FCC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Pacifica Foundation granting the FCC limited authority under the First Amendment to regulate broadcast indecency. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Pacifica Foundation granting the FCC limited authority under the First Amendment to regulate broadcast indecency. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
In 1978, the Court held in FCC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Pacifica Foundation (1978), the Court did uphold restrictions on vulgar words on the radio — a question that’s now being reconsidered by the Court, in FCC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation, upholding the policy as it then existed. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Pacifica Foundation (and Its Second Life)Adam M. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation in 1978, to take context into account in determining whether a given utterance or depiction was “indecent.” [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978) is outdated.The case is Fox Television v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Pacifica Foundation, which said that the FCC's regulation of indecency may not amount to roving censorship or the banning of isolated swear words.  [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation), and noted that broadcasters and the FCC are still in dispute about just how much authority the Commission has under that ruling.   [read post]