Search for: "Fine v. French"
Results 21 - 40
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
I think I want to finally understand the French concept of astreinte. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
Time is money in eBay's ongoing battle with LVMH, as a French appellate court upheld a fine of 50,000 euros per day for as long as the auction site continues to allow sales of several LVMH perfume brands.This ongoing fine is on top of the 38.6 million euros already awarded to LVMH, primarily to compensate for the sale of counterfeit luxury products on eBay, but also as a penalty for the… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
So the wife doesn't get a reversal of all her convictions.Which I'm pretty much fine with. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
Under this law, covering his own face illegally carries a penalty of a €150 fine. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:40 am
In Zemmour v France [2022] ECHR 1130 [in French], the applicant, Éric Zemmour, had been convicted of inciting discrimination and religious hatred against the French Muslim community, on the basis of statements made on a television show in 2016. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:10 am
In Zemmour v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm
In the case of Pinto Coelho v Portugal (No.2) ([2016] ECHR 296)(only in French) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held (by a 6:1 majority) that the imposition of a fine on a journalist who had published unauthorised audio recordings of a criminal trial was a breach of Article 10. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This reasoning walks a fine line without providing any certainty for trade mark holders and future applicants as to where the protection of a word or concept begins and where it ends. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 am
On May 27th 2010, the fine was paid by the applicant for his son. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 am
On May 27th 2010, the fine was paid by the applicant for his son. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:22 pm
To put the judgment in context, some previous verdicts handed down against the French version of Closermagazine have included: a fine of €15,000 for revealing the affair between a French actress and the French President; a fine of €20,000 in damages paid to a far right French politician, after the magazine ‘outed’ his homosexuality; a fine of €15,000 for publishing a story about a non-existing pregnancy of… [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
The Court held in its judgment of June 11th 2009 in Dubus S.A. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:03 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in OPO v Rhodes ([2015] UKSC 32) shows that the tort in Wilkinson v Downton would not be available. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In the Chamber judgment in Peruzzi v Italy ([2015] ECHR 629, only in French) handed down on 30 June 2015, the Court of Human Rights dismissed an application under Article 10 by a lawyer who had been convicted of criminal defamation of a judge. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
Under this law, covering his own face illegally carries a penalty of a €150 fine. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm
In the case of Haldimann v Switzerland (Judgment of 24 February 2015, available only in French), the Second Section held that the conviction of four journalists for having recorded and broadcast an interview of a private insurance broker using a hidden camera was a breach of their Article 10 rights. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 9:54 am
OUT-Law reports (inter alia) that perfume seller LVMH has won its action against eBay for allowing resales of its luxury prfume brands:"Online auction site eBay has been fined £31.5 million and ordered to forbid the sale of some luxury perfumes in a French court order designed to battle the sale of counterfeit luxury goods.Handbag, clothing and perfume company Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy (LVMH) sued eBay in the French courts, claiming… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Conlin v Edmonton (City) Police Service, 2021 ABCA 287 [62] The appellants are correct that there is a fine line between a correctness standard of review and a finding that there was only one possible outcome that was reasonable. [read post]
