Search for: "Greene v. White"
Results 21 - 40
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 11:58 am
’s (“PIM”) trademark for “the shape of a wedge for candy, with an upper green section with white speckles, followed by a narrow middle white section and followed by a lower red section with white speckles” because “the whole trade dress of the red-white-and-green wedge [is] functional when applied to a watermelon candy. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 11:58 am
’s (“PIM”) trademark for “the shape of a wedge for candy, with an upper green section with white speckles, followed by a narrow middle white section and followed by a lower red section with white speckles” because “the whole trade dress of the red-white-and-green wedge [is] functional when applied to a watermelon candy. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:24 pm
Swindon v Aston was wrongly decided. 3.Honeygan-Green v LB Islington was rightly decided at the Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:00 pm
Edward White, The Origins of Modern American Legal History, in 2 Transformations in American Legal History (Harvard University Press 2011) (Daniel W. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:57 pm
Whiting Paper Co., No. 13-2447, and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:45 am
In affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment, the Third Circuit found that PIM’s federally registered trademark to a wedge-shaped candy with green, white and red stripes should be canceled because the mark as a whole identifies the candy’s flavor. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:45 am
In affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment, the Third Circuit found that PIM’s federally registered trademark to a wedge-shaped candy with green, white and red stripes should be canceled because the mark as a whole identifies the candy’s flavor. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The new practice does not say that a black and white version of a mark can’t be used to successfully oppose a colour variant. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:38 pm
We will see how/if this changes with a more environmentally interested president in the White House. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:48 am
I have also made the article available as a white paper for download since it is a bit long.] [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm
From Murphy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 8:23 pm
A clue is offered by Elvis Costello's put-down of a television newscaster: "She takes all the red, yellow, orange and green / And she turns them into black and white. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm
In The Texas Supreme Court Clarifies “Common Carrier” Status Criteria, Pillsbury attorneys Anthony Raven, Olivia Matsushita and Andrew White discuss the Texas Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Sam (I am Green Eggs and Ham) Alito reversed the holding in Marbury v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:36 am
Rawson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:59 am
In Okwedy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:07 am
The battery pack, made in China, is green, silver and black. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
Williams v. [read post]
