Search for: "Griggs v. Duke Power Co." Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm
Duke Power Co., which was decided just two years after race discrimination in the workplace became illegal, is a prime example. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Duke Power Co., of nearly identical language of Title VII, which has been held to protect job seekers. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
  When the Court abruptly changed its mind in 1989, effectively eviscerating the Griggs standard in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Duke Power Co., focusing on what they contend is the Court’s misinterpretation of the fable on which the opinion relied. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power Company, which prohibited relying on employment and promotion decisions on the results of tests with discriminatory impact, and Meredith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, where the Court interpreted § 703(a)(2) of Title VII and held that disparate impact was a viable theory of liability. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Seth Kreimer
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., the Supreme Court concluded that the power conferred by the RLA on unions functioning as exclusive bargaining representatives was a “power not unlike that of a legislature” and that if the statute permitted the power be used on the basis of “hostile discrimination,” constitutional questions would arise. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Pamela Wolf
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, ruled that a high school diploma requirement was discriminatory due to its disparate impact on African-Americans and because it was not job-related and consistent with a business necessity. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which strongly suggest that § 703(a)(2), the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Duke Power Gun control Guns Guns Guns and demonstrations Gunslingers Hamas Hamas Happy holidays Harassment Hard-working Harm Harris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:56 pm by Christine E. Lyon and Mary Race
Duke Power Co., which challenged the company’s requirement that workers pass intelligence tests and have high school diplomas. [read post]