Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2025, 3:30 am
Supreme Court, in upholding the Hyde Amendment in Harris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 12:19 pm
He added that such a move would strip away protections that have existed since the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 5:46 am
In a petition to the Supreme Court filed in Department of State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 3:11 am
In a decision last year, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 1:53 pm
Harris v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 7:17 am
Harris argues that foreign states are not persons. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 8:20 am
Compared to the definitions from Nguyen or the Second Circuit’s Meyer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 11:56 am
Ct. 926 (Mem.) (2021); United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm
Judge Harris Hartz dissented, citing Supreme Court precedent recognizing that “speech is not unprotected merely because it is uttered by professionals. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
In a much-anticipated decision, Maffei v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
In a much-anticipated decision, Maffei v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 5:48 am
The legal issue in Holtzman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
It recently filed such a letter in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 2:33 am
The defendant’s “submissions in support of [its] motion did not establish, prima facie, the absence of at least one element of the legal malpractice cause of action” (McGlynn v Burns & Harris, Esq., 223 AD3d at 734). [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 3:42 pm
When the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:26 am
Harris pointed out a 1935 Supreme Court decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:46 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935) [2]Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
The DOJ justified its finding based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
The caption reads Missouri v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]