Search for: "Hearns v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2008, 1:44 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
For a civil procedure professor, you couldn't ask for any better teaching tool.The case also sheds a little bit of personal insight into the trials and tribulations (as well as the lives) of two of the plaintiff's attorneys: Danuta Tuszynska (a Riverside sole practitioner and Western State graduate) and Letitia Pepper (a Hastings graduate who also practices in Riverside). [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Hearn pointedly noted that, because Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 9:46 pm
The plaintiff in Hearn v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
Keeping pace as the leading execution state in America (more than quadrupling the next highest state, Virginia), Texas will have ready its execution chamber for Yokamon Hearn, despite clear and consistent evidence that he is brain damaged. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 5:42 am
Citing Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Today's post is authored by colleague Thor Hearne, who regularly represents property owners in the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
He cited two subsequent cases, State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
United States, No. 10-463L (May 24, 2012), and Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
A 2012 Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
LEXIS 28765 (SD TX, Feb. 21, 2018), a Texas federal district court dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint that some of his religious articles were confiscated.In Hearns v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am
Hearn’s opinion focused heavily on the holdings of six states with “strikingly similar constitutional privacy protections” applied to protect privacy in medical decisionmaking: Louisiana in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:19 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:27 pm
But its opinion in Atkins v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
In last month’s case (Felix v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
