Search for: "Hilts v. State" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
He argued that the standard of proof is also relevant for this discussion, referring to the up to the hilt standard in prior use cases. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
This fall, in Moore v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by SHG
The Post will play it to the hilt, because that’s what the Post does. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm by The Legal Blog
BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Deepak Varma, in Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. v. [read post]
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am by INFORRM
’ Fourthly, and relatedly, the response puts the greatest emphasis on the recipient’s emotions as evidence of the wrong requiring state intervention. [read post]