Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In a recent judgment, the Quebec Superior Court denied a request for an order against a wholesaler/retailer to identify the suppliers of branded products obtained via parallel importation and sold in Quebec without the brand owner’s authorization. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In a recent judgment, the Quebec Superior Court denied a request for an order against a wholesaler/retailer to identify the suppliers of branded products obtained via parallel importation and sold in Quebec without the brand owner’s authorization. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is the rare hostile environment case does not involve explicitly-racial comments directed toward the plaintiff; rather it involves personnel actions and statements made at Housing Authority meetings.The case is Williams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am by Robin
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:24 pm
The California Supreme Court held that trial courts may deny attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs in discrimination cases brought under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, if the plaintiff recovers less than the $25,000 jurisdictional minimum for superior court. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:40 pm
S138130 (C043392 - Sacramento County Superior Court - 02AS05476) Argued in Sacramento 11-06-07 This case includes the following issue: When a person who is authorized to use marijuana for medical purposes under the California Compassionate Use Act (Health & Saf. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
Specifically, the court affirmed a superior court decision that precluded the City of Los Angeles from enforcing an affordable housing ordinance against a mixed-use project that is being developed by Palmer. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:33 am by Giles Peaker
Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors (2023) UKSC 9 The issue for the Supreme Court was whether the wording of section 40 and 41 Housing and Planning Act 2016 meant that a rent repayment order could be made against only a tenant’s immediate landlord, or also against a superior landlord (where the occupying tenant’s landlord themselves had a tenancy of the property) where that landlord had also committed a relevant offence. [read post]