Search for: "In re Garnett"
Results 21 - 40
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 3:17 am
Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman: yes, the confirmation process had gone wrong, but not necessarily in the way we’re told [National Affairs] A case against judicial restraint [Ilya Shapiro, same, related Cato] “Business and the Roberts Court without Scalia” [Jonathan Adler, related on supposed “pro-business” Court] SCOTUS should (again) step in to reject Obama end-run around advice/consent on appointment power [Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry, Cato] The… [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 5:38 pm
In order to re-establish the correlation between substantive law and the choice of law rules, the paper identifies leading theoretical features of modern-day marriage law, including the principle of party autonomy. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:28 am
In order to re-establish the correlation between substantive law and the choice of law rules, the paper identifies leading theoretical features of modern-day marriage law, including the principle of party autonomy. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:12 am
They're toast this year. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:12 am
They're toast this year. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:47 am
Sure, I know that the C's are playing without Garnett and Perkins - but really, the Rockets, at home? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:47 am
Sure, I know that the C's are playing without Garnett and Perkins - but really, the Rockets, at home? [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
If you're one of those scholars, please get in touch! [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:56 pm
But what happens if you’re in litigation limbo, with losses big enough to really hurt but not big enough to justify pursuing a claim on your own? [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am
Garnett is Professor of Law, Concurrent Professor of Political Science, and the Director of the Program on Church, State & Society at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 5:23 pm
That said, I know Bodie and Garnett care *a ton*, and they're awfully sweet guys, so do them a favor and stick a vote in their stocking when you get bored over the next couple days. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:50 am
Among other things, I got to re-read, and talk to smart young lawyers about, After Virtue! [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
Garnett is the Paul J. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:08 am
The lot was to be re-transferred to Ross once the mortgage was paid. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:35 pm
I’d imagine, for the time being, that distinction belongs to Kevin Garnett et al. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:53 am
Update: Over at YLJ's The Pocket Part, there is an interesting exchange among Nicole Stelle Garnett, Richard Briffault (Columbia), and Bob Ellickson (Yale). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
The following contribution to our contraceptive mandate symposium comes from Richard Garnett, professor of law at Notre Dame Law School. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:41 pm
But we're talking about a small number of cases -- none where the claim of personal responsibility is attenuated, and none where the claimant is a large business. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am
This is true even if, in some of these cases, doing so involved re-fashioning, clarifying, limiting, or even abandoning some "preexisting", but misguided, "doctrine[s]. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm
Some sex offenders get treatment in prison, but not all, Garnett said. [read post]
