Search for: "In Re Marriage of Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm by divi
Unless you’re a public employer generally First Amendment speech protections don’t apply to the workplace. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm by Andrew Delaney
The Baker defendants’ pitch is that the trial court’s enlargement of time expired before the Baker defendants were served. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
” You may have also caught the article Santa Claus in court: From bingo prizes to custody hearings by Nathan Baker earlier this week in The Lawyer’s Daily. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Sunday, 820 NE 2d 636 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2004 It can get even more personal. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am by SHG
We’re often confronted with the clash of rights, but at minimum we have a paper that tells us which are superior to others called the Constitution. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
In National Journal, Sam Baker previewed next week’s oral arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 9:58 am by Walter Olson
Tags: Oregon, same-sex marriage, social media, urban legends about lawsuitsViral junk and the Culture War: think before you share is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 5:43 pm by Tom Smith
Of itself hardly news, or good news if you're the type that subscribes to the notion that anybody not named you dying in El Paso, Texas is good news. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Lots of protected expression goes into these products, but they're not created according to the demands or preferences of the particular customer. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:00 pm by Shawn Garrison
Face Certain Realities Sure, there are the bakers who refuse to make cakes for gay weddings and states where judges are refusing to abide by marriage equality, so is it a shock that a judge might not rule fairly, by the law of that state? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:43 am
If they think they're going to shut up Geraldine Ferraro with that kind of stuff, they don't know me. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
Although we’re now in 2011 — don’t forget to date your checks properly — we can still see 2010 in the rearview mirror. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:54 am by Morning Dockette
[DealBook / New York Times]* Hey 1Ls, Baker Botts is hiring, but only diverse candidates need apply. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am by Andrew Delaney
”SCOV writes a nice concise summary of the last 15 years going from Baker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am by msatta
For example, Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, stated that “any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons in effect be allowed to put up signs saying ‘no goods or services will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages,’ something that would impose a serious stigma on gay persons. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am by Kalvis Golde
Hodges, in which the justices struck down state bans on same-sex marriage, to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]