Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm by Todd Presnell
The Nixon Case A federal grand jury investigating the break-in at the Watergate complex issued a subpoena to President Nixon seeking nine audiotapes. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
Or they've heard enough criticism about their partisan, secretive ways and they're yielding to pressure to legitimatize themselves. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am by Margaret Taylor
” To put an even finer point on it, this week Trump himself told reporters, “We’re fighting all of the subpoenas. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  Cox secured a grand jury subpoena requiring the President to produce even more of the tapes. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
Nixon would remove portions which he considered irrelevant to the subpoenas. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:23 pm by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
Res. 660” was released separately by the Rules Committee and will be printed in the Congressional Record, but is not integrated into the resolution itself. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
August 9 The Senate Committee takes legal action against Nixon for failure to comply with the subpoena. [read post]
The articles of impeachment drawn up against both Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton contained similar allegations. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
August 29, 2019, – NY DA serves subpoena on Mazars. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:05 am by Stephen Bates
Nixon ordered Cox to withdraw the subpoenas and accept transcripts instead; Cox refused. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Lovechilde
  After all, we survived Nixon and Reagan and Bush II. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
You’re not asserting any privilege, she asks, so what specifically is the constitutional interest of the president? [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
A better idea might be a special prosecutor -- an idea now being bruited -- with all necessary investigative, subpoena and other powers and with unlimited time and money to do the job.A third possibility is to turn over these people to an international tribunal of one kind or another. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Nixon and In re Sealed Case (involving the Iran-Contra investigation), which established that the attorney general holds the statutory authority to appoint a special counsel (or a special prosecutor and independent counsel, respectively). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:51 am by Jackie McDermott
 He said the Nixon precedent does not apply because challenges to the congressional subpoenas of officials in the Nixon administration were litigated in the courts, whereas the subpoenas of Trump administration officials were dealt with by the legislature. [read post]