Search for: "In re Michelle M. (1992)"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
” Strine concludes with the 1985 case arising from Ronald Perelman’s hostile bid for Revlon Inc., whose French CEO, Michel Bergerac, Strine says, had “a strong personal antipathy” for his antagonist, “some Jewish guy from Philadelphia. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
Pierre Ilunga M’Bundu wa Biloba, Minister of Justice and Keeper of the Seals, and H.E. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Fishkin criticises me for ‘never squarely discuss[ing] the fact that Reconstruction Republicans sought to re-build the regime entirely around ‘legislative power and legislative duty, not courts’. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and its companion 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
Anna M. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
HR managers must be sensitive to and investigate discrimination claims reasonably before making decisions or taking action. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
With that in mind we arrived at a tentative answer: yes--but that "yes" requires a re conception of democratic practice in ways alien to liberal democracies that center notions of "representation" and "election" in the construction of their own democratic universe. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
PDF 1992. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
After donating to the NRCC, donors are shown a yellow box with a small pre-checked box that warns: “If you UNCHECK this box, we will have to tell Trump you’re a DEFECTOR. [read post]
