Search for: "In the Interest of KB" Results 21 - 40 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2008, 9:06 am
I'm listening online right now to an interesting Congressional hearing from the US Joint Economic Committee (see the hearing page here), via Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:55 am
  Readers may be interested to know when Buffett wrote these statements. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
DAVID BADERTSCHER The following posting consists of a series of documents selected to hopefully help provide those readers interested with an overview of the budget and the budget process. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:22 am
[LINK] [via PatentHawk] See the Forest: A new IP analytics site titled “See the Forest” is lets you create some interesting patent maps: http://see-the-forest.com. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
In the present case it is common ground that both KBS and Haldex are part of an oligopoly in the field of braking systems for commercial vehicles and that their trade is conducted throughout the EU. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:24 am
On the basis of this list, the Commission will invite experts in the respective area to thematic workshops to discuss issues which are considered relevant for the economic context of IP.Should you be interested and qualified, please indicate your interest using the link below.Call for expression of interest(118 KB) Workshops on economic issuesWorkshop on the concepts of “commercial scale” and “commercial purpose” in the context of IP… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
There is an interesting provision that a reasonable royalty may be calculated as the price of licensing a “similar noninfringing substitute in the relative market. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:53 pm by Jim Pravel
”The CAFC agreed with the TTAB and affirmed its holding based on the following factors:First, in 1998, Mattel entered into discussions with KB Toys about becoming the exclusive retailer of CRASH DUMMIES toys. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:52 am by INFORRM
That, as well as a suspect’s interests, is the public interest specifically protected by the Contempt of Court Act” [70]. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:00 pm
One of the cases on tomorrow's Supreme Court calendar is an interesting matter arising from a question posed in federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
In Blake v Fox [2022] EWHC 3542 (KB), Mr Justice Nicklin found that “the meaning of [Mr Fox’s] Tweet is that each of the Claimants was a paedophile, someone who had a sexual interest in children and who had or was likely to have engaged in sexual acts with or involving children, such acts amounting to serious criminal offences. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 4:25 am by Frank Cranmer
In Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v KB & Ors [2024] EWHC 3292 (Fam), Fatima, a ten-year-old Muslim girl, was a patient in the Hospital. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:25 am by INFORRM
In this case, in our judgement, the public interest in promoting the just, speedy and economic resolution of the proceedings outweighs the countervailing public interests. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:46 am by D. Daxton White
Also, the conflict of interest in having the sponsor of the nontraded REIT establish the valuation of the REIT is obvious. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
 (PDF, 81 KB)Of these, some are very interesting, some are fairly pedestrian, some are horribly wordy and full of legal 'analysis', footnotes and references, some are fairly predictable ill-informed anti-patent rants, while others are merely irrelevant. [read post]