Search for: "In the Interest of LaRue"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
In LaRue, the damages were claimed as decreased monetary value as a result of the actions of the administrator. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:05 pm
There are two particularly interesting side notes about this. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
But as I thought about it more, it struck me that, after LaRue (which is still the hot topic in benefits' circles), someone might be interested in 401(k) fees.The Employee Benefits Security Administration has a site called "A Look at 401(k) Fees. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:48 am
You know, people often get bogged down when talking about ERISA with the limitations of the statute and the protections it provides on the individual level; that is, to an extent, what the hullabaloo about the LaRue case is about, as it concerns the question of whether investment losses in a 401(k) plan are actionable if they only injure an individual, or instead only if they have a macro effect on the plan as a whole. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:40 pm
In LaRue v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:08 pm
401(K) Party May Sue for Fiduciary Breach Under ERISA is a well written April 7, 2008 New York Law Journal article by Jeffrey S. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
Certainly, the ERISA rulings out of the Court this past term were hardly pro-employer or pro-business community, as both LaRue and MetLife v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
I thought I would pass along a couple of things of interest that I read this week, before next week starts up with its own events. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:38 pm
The claim LaRue made under that section, it noted, was that he was only seeking to have the plan reflect what would have been his interest in it. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:24 pm
After her termination in December of 2009, LaRue sued Kalex, contending that upon her hiring, she was orally promised that she would receive a 25% ownership interest in the company after three years of employment with Kalex. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
Note the particularly interesting post from Texas attorney Jamie Spencer, on the potential employment pitfalls of blogging. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 12:16 pm
In its opinion, the Fourth Circuit said that a lawsuit is okay when it seeks to enforce the rights of the whole plan, rather than just the interests of a single account. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:39 am
It argued that LaRue has withdrawn all of the funds from his pension account and thus he is no longer a plan participant, leaving him with "no legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the case. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
See LaRue,128 S. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:55 am
As anticipated, the LaRue decision contains interesting footnotes. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:30 pm
His teaching and research interests include bankruptcy law, commercial law, and legal history. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
It kind of teases those Americans who put ketchup on everything, but I find it interesting that one of the companies that distribute these shirts is none other than Heinz. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 5:10 am
Why has the Roberts Court become so interested in labor and employment law issues? [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:25 am
In any event, now that I have whet your whistle for all things Glenn, you can find all things Glenn, including everything you need to know in advance of the oral argument if this is something of interest to you, right here. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:23 am
(See LaRue v. [read post]
