Search for: "Jim Greiner" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Ian Ayres
Crosspost from Freakonomics:Harvard Professors Jim Greiner and Cassandra Pattanayak have posted a remarkable randomized experiment (“What Difference Representation? [read post]
15 May 2013, 11:57 am by Ivan Cohen
I am also collaborating with my wonderful and indefatigable colleague Jim Greiner and a colleague in the LSP world to do further work concerning experimentation in the delivery of legal services and the research ethics and research design issues it raises. - I. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
James Greiner, Dalié Jiménez and Lois R. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:14 am by Steve Davies
Robel 07/18/2011 Jenifer Lee Edison Mission Energy 07/18/2011 Bonnie Bath Epler 07/18/2011 Steven Grasty Harney County Court 07/18/2011 Jim Madden Element Power 07/18/2011 Barbara Durkin 07/18/2011 Maxine A. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:42 pm by Deborah J Merritt
Jim Greiner at Harvard has done some excellent work in this field, as have a few other legal scholars, but we need much more. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" Ian Ayres refers us to a study bound to give a certain subset of lawyers and law professors pause: Harvard Professors Jim Greiner and Cassandra Pattanayak have posted a remarkable randomized experiment (“What Difference Representation? [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 2:30 pm by Doug Cornelius
He was joined by Natasha Vij Greiner, Director, SEC, Division of Investment Management and Sam Waldon, Acting Deputy Director and Chief Counsel, SEC, Division of Enforcement, for the SEC Directors Panel. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by Justin Levitt
Defenders of Section 5 argue that the coverage formula is constitutionally adequate because it captures most of the former Jim Crow South, where intentional racial discrimination in the electoral process is likely to be worse than in other states. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by Justin Levitt
Defenders of Section 5 argue that the coverage formula is constitutionally adequate because it captures most of the former Jim Crow South, where intentional racial discrimination in the electoral process is likely to be worse than in other states. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:23 am by Dave Hoffman
Offers, Actual Use, and the Need for Randomization, the forthcoming Yale Law Journal article by Jim Greiner and Cassandra Wolos Pattanayak. [read post]