Search for: "Johnson v. Murphy" Results 21 - 40 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am by Andrew Hamm
Murphy – writing after the discovery of President Lyndon Johnson’s papers relating to Fortas, which Johnson ordered destroyed but which his staff secretly preserved – focused on Fortas’ downfall as a result of ethical scandals that surfaced during and after his nomination for chief justice. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Lauren Kuley
  Murphy’s (first) Law — Jurisdiction is often the first topic encountered by law students; fittingly, Judge Eric Murphy confronted it in his first published opinion as a Sixth Circuit judge–In re Capital Contracting Company. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Carissa Hessick discusses Johnson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Kevin Johnson previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]