Search for: "King v. State Farm Ins. Co." Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 1:43 am
BergNASSAU COUNTYInsurance LawDriver Not Barred From Seeking UM Benefits; Insurer Denied Stay of UM ArbitrationMatter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:33 am
Co., Index No. 92971/2006 (Civil Court, Kings Co.), found that State Farm "failed to meet its burden" of proving lack of medical necessity, and granted judgment in favor of the plaintiff. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 286 AD2d 679 [2001]), and the follow-up request was in proper form (see Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.6 [b]; Doshi Diagnostic Imaging Servs. v State Farm Ins. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 8:59 am
Serio, 11 NY3d 43 (2008):Because the overall purpose of FOIL is to ensure that the public is afforded greater access to governmental records, FOIL exemptions are interpreted narrowly (see Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Hartford Life Ins Co    Eastern District of Kentucky at LexingtonRONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., No. 1:07CV134, 2008 U.S. [read post]