Search for: "Kohl v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Thus, whatever effect ordinary murders, or robbery, or gun possession might have on interstate commerce (or on any other subject of federal concern) was irrelevant to the question of congressional power....and...United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
The plans, called Medicare Advantage, are run through private health insurers as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare plans.Medicare Billing Fraud: DRUG SUPPLIER CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR KEEPING OVERPAYMENTS, COURT RULES, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
Doar, which was filed on April 10, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
' They're still looking at, ‘Does that equate to an energy efficient unit,' ” Kohl said.EPA in a March 4 letter criticized a permit proposed by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality for PacifiCorp Energy, which plans to add two natural gas-fired generating units to its existing Lake Side Power Plant in Utah County.EPA said the proposed permit would have required PacifiCorp to use “high efficiency” gas turbines with heat… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
While the statements in question may have been made in the United States, they were republished in Ontario and were alleged to have caused injury to Lord Black’s reputation in Ontario. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]