Search for: "Layman v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am by Afro Leo
In layman’s terms, not as strong as the iPhone mark but still a protectable mark and, of course, it is registered. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm by Apsosredesign
  1532: During the reign of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, law passed stating the opinion of medical men must be formally given in the cases of violent death. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am by zamansky
Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (which, in layman’s terms, is simply a formal request to review a lower court’s ruling) in the case of Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:11 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Texan Land & Cattle II, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
(v)               Consent may be revoked or withdrawn any time before or during the act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
v=dwTQ_U3p5Wc&t=334s and scientific literature at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917305268 or  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2489204/. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Dingemans J first provided his views on the single meaning of the words complained of; “determined from the viewpoint of the layman, not by the techniques of a lawyer” (Jeynes v. [read post]