Search for: "Leone v. Leone"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2024, 7:47 pm
Practitioners interested in commercial conflict of laws in Africa will find this work very useful. [1] The Attorney General v Cassius Mining Limited (Suit No CM/MISC/0568/2023), decided on 31 July 2023; Magna International Transport Ltd v Ghana Telecom Communications Co Ltd (Suit No: H1/227/2018), decided on 17 October 2019; Quantum Oil Terminals Ltd v International Finance Corporation, Suit No: Misc/00228/17 (Rulings of 8 January 2018 and 23 February 2018). [2] Vedanta… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 4:47 am
“On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference” (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897 [2022]; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:33 am
” The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 11:50 pm
The Archibald Coxes, the Leon Jaworskis, the Robert Muellers, the Jack Smiths: We may never see the likes of them again. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:41 am
Read the opinion The post BRANDON LEON SHIELDS v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:07 am
,Kinqston Check Cashing Corp., v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:52 am
Co. v North Am. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
… Canadian Privacy Law Blog OKImportant new Ontario court decision on privilege in incident response documentation The Ontario divisional court has just released a decision, LifeLabs LP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am
We encountered this problem in our article about Eikenberry v Lamson, in which Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman wrote that it is “well settled in New York that a partnership or a joint venture may not operate through a corporate form and that any fiduciary obligations that the partners owe one another cease to exist once they agree to conduct business as a corporation,” but that there is an “exception” to this rule “where the… [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
