Search for: "Maintenance of Way Employees v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Supreme Court resolves two clashing principles: the right to speak your mind and protest before government officials, and the need to protect the President of the United States from assassination.The case is Wood v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
McSweeney, 166 N.H. 176, 90 A.3d 1236 (New Hampshire Supreme Court 2014); see also § 541–B:19, I(d) (providing that the state and state employees are immune from suit for `[a]ny claim arising out of an intentional tort, including . . . libel [and] slander . . . provided that the employee . . . reasonably believes . . . that his conduct was lawful, and provided further that the acts complained of were within the scope of official duties of the… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Fund Six diversions have been controversial in the past, as critics say that reducing money marked for highway construction and maintenance leaves the state relying on private entities to build toll roads. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
Key Precedent R.C. 1533.18 ((A) “Premises” means all privately owned lands, ways, and waters, and any buildings and structures thereon, and all privately owned and state-owned lands, ways, and waters leased to a private person, firm, or organization, including any buildings and structures thereon.) [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 15.20 Fault of Plaintiff’s Employer or Co-Employee The Case: Snyder v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am by MBettman
Greeley v Miami Valley Maintenance Contrs., Inc., 49 Ohio St.3d 228, 551 N.E.2d 981 (1990) (recognizing an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine by holding that at-will employee may maintain a cause of action in tort for wrongful discharge when the employee is terminated in violation of a clearly expressed public policy.) [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Fred Pressley
In a decision issued on April 2, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States held in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]