Search for: "Matter of Carmen P." Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(In re Erica R., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th at p. 913) The Attorney General agrees that `as a general matter, using electronic devices is not illegal,’ and she does not contest that the second prong is met.We conclude that the third prong required to invalidate a probation condition is not met, however, because the electronics search condition is reasonably related to future criminality. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
Before I get to the meat of the matter, be sure to read and register here (the speaker names are at this end of this post). [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
Before I get to the meat of the matter, be sure to read and register here (the speaker names are at this end of this post). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:30 am by WSLL
., and CARMEN VANDRE, husband and wife v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:12 am by Wells Bennett
   We will continue to investigate this matter with the greatest diligence and expediency, and we will do all that we can to protect those we serve. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Martin George
NO. 44/2001 applicable in respect of an action for a negative declaration in tort matters? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:17 pm by Rick
Numerous people did care, but all they could do was sit and wonder, “Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego Stephen Petrick? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Shigley
People caught in a cycle of addiction, crime and unemployment are as a practical matter unavailable for productive employment and responsible parenting of children they help bring into the world. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The district court dismissed the Stephens County matter for lack of standing and the Apache Tribe matter as not ripe. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:22 pm by nyinjuries
” The dissent, written by Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman with a concurrence by Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, would have held that the supervisors’ repeated assurances that “things were happening” and “something was being done” suggested an impending solution to the dangerous situation. [read post]