Search for: "Matter of Failing v Clark"
Results 21 - 40
of 628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
”* Clark v Schuylerville Cent. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:25 am
KILMER, JR. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Is this a matter for the judgment of the editors or is it an area in which the law should impose standards? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Is this a matter for the judgment of the editors or is it an area in which the law should impose standards? [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 9:22 am
Clarke has failed to doso in this case. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:33 am
The Court of Appeals rejects her claim.The case is Clark v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
Gilead claimed that Pharmasset Barbados was the successor in title to Mr Clark the inventor, and thus able validly to claim priority under the Paris Convention, by virtue of the employment contract of Mr Clark, and an agreement between the two Pharmasset companies. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:37 am
Super. at 622 (quoting Clark v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:24 am
Mr Justice Roth gave emphasis to the following paragraph from Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 on the circumstances in which confidentiality is imposed:"It seems to me that if the circumstances are such that any reasonable man standing in the shoes of the recipient of the information would have realised that upon reasonable grounds the information was being given to him in confidence, then this should suffice to impose upon him the equitable obligation of… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
Mr Justice Hildyard heard the matter on 9 August 2013. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Is this a matter for the judgment of the editors or is it an area in which the law should impose standards? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
" (Citing Clark v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
Clark v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of… [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:25 pm
By failing to comply with statutory (and regulatory) (deJesus v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
CASEY v. [read post]
