Search for: "Matter of Majesty S."
Results 21 - 40
of 578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2009, 3:04 am
Her Majesty the Queen, (NB Ct. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 8:42 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:26 am
The subject matter was the construction of Section 83(3) of the Finance Act 1989. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
Steven Sieff, consultant in the tax team at CMS, offers a preview of the decision awaited in Project Blue Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs After initially being heard by the First-tier Tribunal in 2013 and most recently by the Court of Appeal in 2016, the Project Blue SDLT case finally reached the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 28 February 2018. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:38 am
What matters is the character of the debits, not that of any corresponding credit. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:08 am
In Equitable Members Action Group v Her Majesty's Treasury [2009] EWHC 2495 (Admin), the claimant action group, comprising of current and former policyholders of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (the Society), applied for a Judicial Review of HM Treasury's rejection of certain findings by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman).The Ombudsman had received complaints that individuals had suffered injustice through maladministration on… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
C must in fact have relied upon the common assumption rather than merely upon C’s own independent view of the matter. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
In this post, Joanna Clark and Emma Ainsley of CMS discuss the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 15 July 2020 in a referral from the High Court of Justiciary, the Scottish criminal appeal court, in the matter of Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by so-called “paedophile hunter” groups in criminal trials. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:05 pm
It's not that I think Boehner is a security risk (Of course, Pelosi's a different matter). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
The Michaelmas Term starts next Thursday (3 October 2013) with Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs in the Supreme Court, and Bethel & Ors v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Bahamas in the Privy Council. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
The same goes for lawyers, and particularly judges, who sometimes confuse the majesty of their robes for subject matter expertise. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am
The Michaelmas term starts on Thursday 3 October 2013 with Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, to be heard by L Neuberger, L Sumption, L Reed, L Toulson, and L Hodge. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:43 am
I did not call her ‘Your Majesty’ or Ma’am. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:51 am
Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24 (25 May 2011) - Read judgment The Supreme Court has had to consider (for the second time in a month) the ticklish question of what constitutes a “miscarriage of justice”. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
It did not matter where the material was to be found. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, the appellant, rejected the respondent’s claim for repayment of the alleged overpayment and the respondent appealed that decision. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
The full panel of eleven Judges, called Justices, heard the matter which was dealt with as appeals from courts in Scotland and England. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” Based on stare decisis, the High Court in London held "In our view, the decision of the Prime Minister to advise Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament is not justiciable in Her Majesty’s courts. [read post]
