Search for: "McCullough v. Smith"
Results 21 - 25
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 3:23 pm
Notably, CMS and OIG propose to expressly exclude, or are seeking comments regarding whether to exclude, certain entities from participating in protected arrangements on the basis of historical enforcement and oversight experience: (i) pharmaceutical manufacturers; (ii) manufacturers, distributors, or suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS); (iii) laboratories; (iv) pharmacy benefit managers; and (v) other wholesalers and distributors. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
J. 20 *** Susan Power Johnston, CRAM-DOWN INTEREST RATES: DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING TILL V. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
In Harris and Smith counties, more than two-thirds were under $5,000. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
McCullough ordered that Jane undergo an EKG and abdominal x-rays. [read post]
