Search for: "Michael Klarman" Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2018, 11:00 am by Howard Bashman
“Why Democrats Should Pack the Supreme Court”: Michael Klarman has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:11 am
In recent years, leading scholars such as Michael Klarman and Gerald Rosenberg have argued that judicial review is rarely if ever effective in protecting rights that aren't supported by the political... [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:14 am by Stephen Griffin
For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.In his outstanding book The Framers’ Coup, Michael Klarman’s great objective is to retrieve the immediate context in which the Constitution was adopted and so recover our most fundamental document as a Federalist political project. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:00 am by mes286
University of Chicago Law School – Michael Klarman, Kirkland & Ellis Professor of Law, Harvard Law School presents today as part of the Constitutional Law Workshop Series. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
" She offers up a meaty entry for you future constitutional law scholars right here: "The debate featured Judge Michael McConnell (10th Circuit) defending the originalist position against Professor Michael Klarman, who argued that the originalist position was spurious (Professor Michael Seidman served as moderator). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:24 pm
Donohue III (Yale), Deborah Hensler (Stanford), Michael Klarman (Harvard), Deborah Rhode (Stanford), and Mark Roe (Harvard)--as well as former law professors Ronald Daniels (now President of Johns Hopkins, formerly at... [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:36 am by Michael Perry
That's the subtitle of a new book by Harvard legal historian Michael Klarman. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:36 pm
So reports Einer Elhauge (Harvard)--in addition to those we've reported previously (Michael Klarman [Virginia], Martha Nussbaum [Chicago], William Rubenstein [UCLA], and Cass Sunstein [Harvard]), Professor Elhauge also now confirms offers to Yochai Benkler (Yale), Richard Ford (Stanford), Pamela Karlan (Stanford),... [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:31 am
Klarman In the short term, Brown v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 3:00 am by Christopher Schmidt
In my last post I discussed Michael Klarman’s recently published book, From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (Oxford, 2012). [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:33 am
For those interested in avoiding work and/or learning about the new scholarship on race and American Constitutional Development, Professor Michael Klarman of the University of Virginia Law School and I are blogging about his new book, Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:10 pm by Orin Kerr
Stuntz, edited by Michael Klarman, David Skeel, and Carol Steiker. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:56 pm
The Law Library of Congress will commemorate Constitution Day with a book talk by Michael J. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Last week, we were privileged to hear Professor Michael Klarman speak on Why Brown  v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:48 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Posts this week have included Ken Mack on The Supreme Court as a Racially Representative Institution and Michael Klarman on Has the Supreme Court Been Mainly a Friend or a Foe to African Americans? [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:00 pm by JB
” The speakers were Michele Goodwin (UCI), Michael Klarman (Harvard) and myself. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Alexander Hamilton, by Constantino Brumidi (LC)Just in time for the Tonys: The National Constitution Center has posted the podcast Hamilton: The Man and the Musical, in which Harvard Law School’s Annette Gordon-Reed and Michael Klarman “discuss Hamilton's constitutional legacy and the Broadway musical that bears his name. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 7:27 am
He relies principally on Michael Klarman, author of From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality, and he makes it seem as if the answer is reasonably clear, and that the categories (law and society) are separate [read post]