Search for: "Michael Rosman" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 8:00 pm
Michael Rosman has these comments on the majority opinion and Kennedy's concurrence and Hans Bader weighs in on the decision here. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Adam Schlossman
Alfred Mayer and the Uniqueness Of Race” –Michael Rosman, general counsel for the Center for Individual Rights “The Supreme Court, Race, and Political Representation” –Kenneth Mack, professor at Harvard Law School Post on Buchanan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:30 am
Tom Goldstein suggests that these alternatives, including drawing district lines with race in mind, are "per se constitutional," see here, while Michael Rosman seems to suggest that some of these alternatives could be subject to strict scrutiny under the Court's precedents, see here. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Richard Kahlenberg
Michael Rosman suggested that race-neutral alternative jurisprudence “is hopelessly bollixed” and suggests that the Court “jettison it altogether.” [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:46 am
 [Full disclosure: I worked with defendant Chevaldina’s attorney in the appeal – Michael Rosman at the Center for Individual Rights – so I won’t pretend to be neutral and/or disinterested] The facts are pretty simple. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
So today, my student Ryan Azad and I filed our amicus brief, through the Scott & Cyan Banister Amicus Brief Clinic and with the help of Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights and Lisa Steele of Steele & Associates. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:18 am
Raanan Katz (Photo by Seffi Magriso) I blogged about this case back when the magistrate judge issued his report, but today the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm by Jim Sedor
The report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz found the FBI had an “authorized purpose” when it initiated its investigation into the Trump campaign and rejected the assertion the case was opened out of political animus or that informants were used in violation of FBI rules. [read post]