Search for: "Myers v. Commissioner" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 8:00 am
  I don't think it is very difficult to justify the board on constitutional grounds - the unitary executive theory's best day was when Myers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard L. Revesz
” In the end, the majority’s revisionist history about three foundational cases of the administrative state—Myers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The penalty imposed by the hearing panel: suspension without pay for one and one-half years.The Greenburgh Central School District #7 challenged the §3020-a hearing panel’s decision by appealing to the State Commissioner of Education and later the courts. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the first case, R v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court said that the underlying facts, coupled the absence of charges ever having previously been filed against the teacher during his 21-year career, supported the Commissioner’s determination that the penalty imposed was proportionate to the offenses for which the teacher was found guilty.The authority of an arbitrator to modify the disciplinary penalty proposed by the employer was a significant issue in Communication Workers of Am., Local 1170 v Town of Greece, 85 AD3s… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 June 2015. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am by war
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Adam White
That is why William Humphrey’s executor framed his legal arguments according to that distinction, distinguishing independent regulatory commissions from the sorts of offices at issue in Myers v. [read post]