Search for: "NATION v. HARNESS"
Results 21 - 40
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
I discussed Daniels v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
For example, the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
This past June, in Ohio v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 1:04 pm
In Alexander v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
Writing for the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro notes that “[a]dvocates for those with intellectual disabilities are applauding the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Indeed, upholding the CIA’s Glomar response here would serve only to harness the Court’s institutional authority to a transparent fiction. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 10:45 am
The European Court of Justice’s decision in Google v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
Their stories came to light through Hurrell-Harring et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:45 am
The reforms here in New York arose in response to a settlement between the NYCLU, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, and New York state in the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:19 am
Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The 2008 decision in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders clarified that the duty of the directors is to the corporation. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am
Fort de l’analyse de réunions et documents de l’OIM, l’ouvrage révèle comment divers fonctionnaires internationaux, diplomates et experts ont formulé, diffusé, matérialisé ou encore contesté la gestion migratoire. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
These topics both reveal the imperial nature of expansion and help to explain the difficulties in recognizing it as such.Chief Justice John Marshall famously ruled in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
At IBM, we're just starting to explore about how Deep QA can be harnessed by lawyers. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:48 pm
A recent essay from law professor John McGinnis, titled “Machines v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
From the majority opinion, by Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, in Cargill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:11 am
While there have been many powerful legal victories in national, regional and international courts, advocates can’t harness that power unless we know and share them. [read post]
