Search for: "Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 9:28 am
As Robert Cooter and I have recently articulated in Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8, 63 Stan. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
Speakers will include Matthew Adler, Jack Balkin, Stuart Benjamin, James Boyle, Erwin Chemerinsky, Robert Cooter, Mark Hall, Gillian Metzger, Abigail Moncrieff, Arti Rai, Barak Richman, Theodore Ruger, Stephen Sachs, Neil Siegel, Ilya Somin, Guy-Uriel Charles and Ernest Young. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
(Neil Siegel, guest-blogging) I learned from Kurt Lash’s new article, which makes novel and creative claims about historical materials that are important to a variety of theories of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Robert Cooter and I expanded the scope of analysis from the Interstate Commerce Clause to Article I, Section 8. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
It was not 2010, with the relatively contemporaneous publication of Yale Law Professor Jack Balkin’s article Commerce in the Michigan Law Review, and Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel’s article “Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8,” that Robert Stern’s original idea received serious scholarly attention and development.In the short time since their initial publication, a number of scholars and… [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
” The case for a “collective action federalism” of this sort has been made at greater length by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review, and by Professor Siegel on these pages. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
A version of these will appear in the 2012 Supplement to Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar and Siegel, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (5th edition). [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
I've made this point in my forthcoming Michigan article on the Commerce Clause, and it is a central claim of Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter's forthcoming Stanford article "Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8" [which, unfortunately, does not seem to be currently posted on SSRN]Put differently, when a federal statute solves a genuine collective action problem, courts should give Congress the benefit of the doubt… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:56 pm
Camilla A. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Moreover, these “other powers” are distinct from the powers encompassed by the first Necessary and Proper Clause, which by its terms are limited to whatever instrumental powers are necessary and proper to carry into effect the “foregoing powers” vested in Congress by Article I, Section 8.The second Necessary and Proper Clause was intended to achieve precisely this objective: to declare and to incorporate into the Constitution the doctrines of implied and inherent powers that… [read post]
