Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES" Results 21 - 40 of 825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
§247d), the Secretary, HHS, determined that a public health emergency (PHE) exists for the United States.[4] February 4, 2020 – Secretary, HHS Declared that a Public Health Emergency Exists Under the FD&C Act: Under Section 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there was a public health emergency that had a significant potential to affect national… [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
They might do this, too, with the laws of Indian tribes, even as the United States pursued efforts to attack and eliminate them. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:03 am by Rich Worf
The Second Circuit had previously implied that such a limitation exists in Parker v. [read post]
 The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm by Chip Merlin
The federal district court disagreed and cited a federal Colorado appellate case our firm won two years ago: For example, in BonBeck Parker, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by John A. Emmons
Kristy Parker, Justin Florence, Genevieve Nadeau, Soren Dayton, and Scott Welder argued that two cases to be heard soon by the Supreme Court, Biden v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am by centerforartlaw
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]