Search for: "Parks v. U.S. Postal Service" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Postal Service regulation which completely prohibits firearms on all postal property, including parking lots. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Jeralyn
Postal Service, Metro-Dade Department of Public Safety, and police departments from North Miami Beach, Aventura, Indian Creek and Homestead, Florida. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Whether or not the United States Postal Service is a unique creature as a federal agency, the USPS sued both the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm by Orin Kerr
 For example, if a person sends a letter in what the Postal Service used to call “Fourth Class” mail — that is, mail that the Postal Service reserves the right to open — then it is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
Finally, the Postal Service was not obligated by federal law to provide parking for its employees, nor did the Postal Service require Dorosan to park in the lot for work. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Haverhill, MA; Matthew Postal, President) Bay State Flag Football League Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:15 am
Under the Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Postal Service, entering national parks, and so on. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
            Having determined that the due process requirement was no longer viable in light of the Supreme Court's decision in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]