Search for: "People v. Haven" Results 21 - 40 of 2,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
 The defendant then tells the court:"I haven't done nothing to take this privilege away from me. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:45 pm
  A 62-year old man agrees to board your dog for $100/week, you say the dog will be there for only two weeks, you actually leave the dog there for five months, you and a couple of your buddies eventually come to the house and take the dog without paying the guy, later you beg him to take the dog again and he agrees (you still haven't paid him), then you come to his house and try to stab him to death?! [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
  But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:55 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
Some people have noticed that I haven't posted anything new to our firm's YouTube channel in about a year and a half. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
  But a around six months before his release date, he gets released from jail pursuant to a program called "sheriff's parole" -- a term I haven't heard before, but that apparently exists. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:28 pm
  Whatever the reason, I simply haven't thought about that particular crime much.But today's opinion involves a defendant convicted for extortion, and Judge Harutunian (sitting from San Diego) writes something that suggests -- quite accurately, I think -- that the line between "extortion" and simple "robbery" is often an incredibly narrow one.Take, as here, a guy who walks up to someone and says (in sum or substance) "Give me $100 or I'll beat… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court, in a divided decision, recently held that the City of New Haven discriminated against one Hispanic and 17 white firefighters, Plaintiffs in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Brian Dolan
Supreme Court ruling that may pave the way for pharmaceutical companies to be liable to people who haven’t taken drugs that the pharmaceutical companies have effectively withdrawn from the market. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:05 am by Tom Smith
Critics say the Court’s 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
  And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:25 am by Richard Hunt
I don’t believe Havens Realty v. [read post]