Search for: "People v. Connelly"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Citing People ex rel. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Citing People ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
Connelly some of the information contained on MediaSentry's data log. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
Connelly, Mem–10–102 (Aug. 12, 2 [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm
Kagan did work at Williams and Connelly for two years (1989-1991) after her clerkship with Justice Marshall. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Connelly v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
The Council falsely alleged that she did not raise concerns about returning Baby Peter to his mother, Tracey Connelly, who was one of three people eventually convicted of causing or allowing his death. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court rejected this vision in Deshaney v. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 5:01 am
Connelly (5th Cir. 2024) (concluding that historical analogues that disarmed "actively intoxicated" people do not justify indefinitely disarming an "occasional drug use[r]" under § 922(g)(3) because "[t]he Founders … allowed alcoholics to carry firearms while sober (and possess them generally)"). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am
” Connelly v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Connelly, Jr.Connelly, William F., 1951-Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4749 .K365 2010To secure the liberty of the people : James Madison's Bill of Rights and the Supreme Court's interpretation / Eric T. [read post]
