Search for: "People v. Farley" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
"People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Implied Bias Case The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am by Andy
Written statements from a number of other people were relied on by both sides. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:39 am by Steve Hall
Several powerful lawmakers, including Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: you interpret the 33% as people not understanding, but maybe they’re reacting to the compound, making them more likely to interpret it as a brand. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
At PatentlyO, Christine Farley explains that Monday’s decision in In Iancu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: why is it a higher burden on P? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  These particular people could have outsized influence. [read post]