Search for: "People v. Minor (1980)"
Results 21 - 40
of 364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 7:52 am
Most recently, in Haynes v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:23 pm
The Act was the result of the NDP conditional support of the Liberal minority government that would create new freedom of information and privacy protections, based on the 1980 report, Public government for private people : the report of the Commission on Freedom of Information and Individual Privacy (the “Williams Report”). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Courts do not like it when dangerous or even potentially dangerous people want to enter a public school building. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
That in itself is a heinous crime BY the State to deny a minor the legal protections and immunities to which one is, and has always been, entitled. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:12 pm
The California Court of Appeal recently considered a case in which the trial court found that the Archdiocese did not have a duty to protect a minor during the late 1980s because of its lack of knowledge about a priest’s past misconduct in Doe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:06 pm
Many people are surprised to find themselves facing felony charges for seemingly minor acts. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:10 am
Board of Education in the 1980s (Anderson 2011). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am
Even if you are not a collector, most people are aware that baseball cards are big business. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Danforth objected to this evidence, but the state courts rejected the objection under the standard the Supreme Court had set forth in the 1980 case of Ohio v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
”) People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:28 pm
It could also result in discrimination not just against LGBTQ people, but against religious minorities, people of color, people with disabilities, and all women. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
