Search for: "People v. Simons (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by NL
Southwark LBC v Dennett [2008] HLR 23 on the requirement of subjective intent noted. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by NL
Southwark LBC v Dennett [2008] HLR 23 on the requirement of subjective intent noted. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
  They were all born in 1996 — the sweet spot for censors who saw young people as allies to reduce free speech. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Burchill ([1996] 4 AER 1008), Neill LJ defined “defamatory” as meaning words which affect the attitude of other people towards the claimant in an adverse manner. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:18 am
App. 4th 1100 (1996), as could a pit bull, People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 1996): Alpex had a patent on a modular plug-in video game system which it accused Nintendo of infringing, but the court found no infringement. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
In South Africa, Abortion is a right codified in law: The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by John Gregory
ACLU v Mukasey 534 F.3d.181  (3d Circ. 2008). [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
  Admittedly, French existentialism is sometimes little more than navel-gazing with bad breath, but Camus at his best is incandescent (and, at his worst, is far better than Stalinist puppets like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir). [read post]