Search for: "People v. Tucker"
Results 21 - 40
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
People v Nimmons, 95 AD3d 1360, 1360-1361, lv denied 19 NY3d 1028; People v Tucker, 91 AD3d 1030, 1031-1032, lv denied 19 NY3d 1002; People v Ham, 67 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040; People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771, 773, lv denied 7 NY3d 848).Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
In a Lafayette, Louisiana, case, Warner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
Bormes v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
Our standard for judging whether a verdict is legally repugnant was articulated in 1981 in People v Tucker (55 NY2d 1). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 4:55 am
Shakespeare Henry V iv. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:56 am
But NASA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
New evidence further supports ACLU case against racialized policing of Black people in Mississippi county. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
United States (Trust Relationship; Tucker Act) Alegre v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:41 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:18 pm
Cover Fellow at Yale Law School Boeing v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:28 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:46 am
Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275; Globe and Mail Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Little Tucker Act Claim – Dismissed The “Little Tucker” Act, codified at 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Thor reports on the latest developments in attorneys fee recovery in Tucker Act and Little Tucker Act cases below. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
" In District of Columbia v. [read post]
