Search for: "People v. Uber Technologies, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am
The Court of Appeals says these rules do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Vugo, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 5854224 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:07 am
E-Commerce/Sharing Economy * Reuters: EU cautions governments against banning Uber, Airbnb * Needle Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Contracts * Express Lien, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Uber was required to file an accounting with the court disclosing the names of people who may have had access to the files at the heart of Waymo's case. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 6:10 am
Facebook, Inc., 2019 WL 2486566 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Facebook, Inc., 2020 WL 4382279 (D.N.J. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., and will decide the following issue: Whether an aggrieved employee who has been compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) that are “premised on Labor Code violations actually sustained by” the aggrieved employee (Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:26 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 20-cv-9224 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:19 am
Uber, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-06604, am. complaint (D.N.J., Dec. 7, 2015). [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:19 am
Uber, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-06604, am. complaint (D.N.J., Dec. 7, 2015). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
[People v. firms? [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 315 F.Supp.3d 1124 (N.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 868 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:17 am
— via FisherBroyles Technology Where Are Your Employees? [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 4:06 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]