Search for: "People v. Wende"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Becker v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Yesterday’s opinion in Welch v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:12 pm
When Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 7:00 am
Tippens and United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
Carroll v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:25 am
Mahrt v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
Dragovich v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:59 am
See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:40 pm
At any rate, the recent decision in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
Aereo and WNET v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
One example is the conviction he secured in the case of People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
