Search for: "Peters v. Director of Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Reuters has a piece “Explainer: Google, Facebook battle Australia over proposed revenue-sharing law”. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
The suit says that the schemes run by the credit card giants ban ATM operators in some EU countries from charging card holders that use their machines, or, in the countries where they do allow such charges, reduce the revenue operators can receive from interchange fees. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Kansas and Peter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
They often use the U.S. banking system to receive illicit payments from users or advertising revenue from companies like Google and Adbrite.[16] Even in the handful of cases where copyright owners are able—at great expense beyond the means of most creators–to get these massive infringers in front of a U.S. judge such as with the Panamanian company Hotfile,[17] the defendant tries to wrap themselves in the protection of the DMCA safe harbor. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Peter Hospital in Olympia, Washington. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:12 pm
This week in Other Barks & Bites: a series of bills introduced into Congress aim to improve prospects for minority inventors, eliminate compulsory copyright licenses in broadcast TV and reduce patent challenges against generic drugmakers; the Federal Circuit decides that there is no functionality in the aesthetic appeal of a design patent; FBI Director Wray testifies on about 1,000 IP theft probes pointing back to Chinese entities; France is the first EU country to adopt the Copyright… [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:19 am
Using Bankruptcy to Stop Credit Card Collections Can Bankruptcy Stop Credit Card Collections? [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Director, Division of Taxation18 also tackled judicial deference. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
That claim was brought by Peter A. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:35 am
It claimed to have no revenue in 2018. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
On September 20, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint (“Complaint”) against Peter C. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Peters. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
