Search for: "Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Women's Surgical Ctr., LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
(relisted after the Mar. 17, Mar. 24, Mar. 31, Apr. 14 and Apr. 21 conferences) Hamm v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
" (IFC, Environmental, Social, and Governance).The goal oriented policy objectives of ESG have also been underscored by the OECD, one that seeks to recionceive the traditional focus on value maximization grounded in traditional financial analysis to a more generalized set of public objectives toward which economic actoivity can contribute, on e in which the markers of financial value are made more a function of public good objectives. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
He said he had landed deals to fix decrepit power plants and finance the development of wind and solar energy. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
Consequently, veteran-owned small businesses must be careful not to cede to another entity approval authority (or veto power) over key business decisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
Judge Buchwald rejected each contention, finding that the Partnership Agreement’s definition of written instrument encompassed electronic transmission; that the email’s informal sign-off (“Thank you, Ron & Walter”) constituted a valid signature under the federal E-SIGN Act; and that the email’s statement that the Fund will be extended “until 2021” connoted an outside date of December 31, 2021, and therefore constituted a valid amendment… [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
The prices on the web of Amazon e-books, Steam-powered computer games,[6] and Staples office supplies differ based on where the user accesses their sites.[7] In these and many other ways, [g]eoblocking enhances market partitioning on the Internet by enabling content and service providers to limit access by users to information about certain goods, services, and/or prices, thereby enabling the providers to discriminate among different markets and offer different goods and services… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm
In RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm
"] From the Supreme Court today in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
E-Mail Systems Now those companies were common carriers, denied such power (and therefore, those courts said, responsibility) by law. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
§552(b)(7)(E). [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm
The decision by Western powers to fight the war in Ukraine through swingeing sanctions regimes is widely regarded as a hugely powerful demonstration of the West’s unified commitment to the championing of liberal democratic values, in the face of an amoral totalitarian aggressor. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
In a development with significant implications for the CPSC’s ability to regulate the e-commerce space, an administrative law judge has ruled that Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Given this paucity of U.S. legal tech IPOs, it is notable that 2021 saw three U.S. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Given this paucity of U.S. legal tech IPOs, it is notable that 2021 saw three U.S. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06208 (2d Dept.,2021) the parties stipulation of settlement dated December 31, 2018 which was incorporated in their September 19, 2019 judgment of divorce provided for joint legal custody of their child, joint decision-making authority, and the defendant having residential custody of the child, subject to the plaintiff’s parental access.. [read post]
