Search for: "Quillen v. Quillen"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 11:25 pm
[But of Lemley/Moore and the rules, see Comments on continuation practice proposal appearing in the Federal Register (Jan. 2006) ] See also Law Review on continuation application issue Ta-tah to Quillen/Webster/Lemley? [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:16 pm
Gene Quinn notes that oral argument in USPTO v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:39 pm
‟" Id. at 1125 (quoting Quillen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
" Looking at the amicus briefs in KSR v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Quillen v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
For all Quillen's squawking about bad searches by the USPTO, and low quality patents, the USPTO did a lot better than the New York Times. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
" Markman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
’ – new study suggests that they aren’t (271 Patent Blog) Here we go again – Cecil Quillen Jr’s NYT letter to the editor re RCEs (Inventive Step) Patent secrecy orders increase (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions Northern District of Ohio: Qui Tam provision found unconstitutional: Unique Product Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
See CIAS, Inc. v. [read post]
