Search for: "ROTH v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
On December 29, 2011, the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion in Rothe Development, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:57 am
Lawsuit dismissed for failure to specify the acts or omissions of unlawful discrimination underlying the complaintRoth v State University of New York, et. al., 61 AD3d 476Jeffrey Roth sued SUNY’s State College of Optometry and named individuals, alleging he was the victim of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:48 am
Jennifer Roth won a motion to suppress in State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:45 am
Here is the front-page Topeka Capital-Journal article reporting that Cindy Sewell and Jennifer Roth won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
On September 16, the Third Circuit (Ambro, Jordan, Roth)) issued a decision in Metropolitan Edison Company v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
Not in Roth v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:28 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
Roth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:10 pm
Randi Roth, Court-appointed Monitor in the landmark race discrimination case against the United States Department of Agriculture, Pigford v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Rothe Development Corporation v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:50 am
Moreover, the Board stated (in dictum) that, even if Otto Roth were inapplicable, petitioner established acquired distinctiveness in Central Florida, where both parties offered their services. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:21 am
The case is Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 1:19 pm
Regents of State Colleges v Roth (1972). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:35 am
Link: Ohio v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
" Rule 3.1113 provides rules for the memorandum in support of the motion, and rule 3.1113(j) states that "[t]o the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:04 am
In Zegelstein v The Roth Law Firm PLLC 2020 NY Slip Op 30581(U) February 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154224/2018 Judge: W. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:57 am
The case is Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd and another company v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2012] EWHC 1719 (Ch), a Patents Court, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Roth of 28 June in relation to a dispute which arose over atorvastatin, a popular pharma product distributed in the UK by Pfizer (Warner Lambert being part of the Pfizer group of companies: the defendant was referred to as 'Pfizer' throughout the proceedings). [read post]
