Search for: "Roberts v. City of Los Angeles" Results 21 - 40 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
 Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
City of Chicago, the challenge to Chicago’s handgun ban, continues. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 2:58 pm by AALRR
Chavez, a police officer, brought numerous claims of alleged discrimination and retaliation against the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Police Department, and others. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, and C-SPAN. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
On Tuesday the Court also heard oral arguments in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Matthew Scarola
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times opines that the Court’s decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
” Also at the Los Angeles Times, David Savage speculates that shifts in public opinion on gay marriage might influence the Court, and in particular Justice Anthony Kennedy and Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
The AP (via the Los Angeles Times) covers the plea bargaining cases Lafler v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Lyle previews the case for this blog; James Vicini of Reuters, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Julia Preston of the New York Times, Jess Bravin and  Miriam Jordan of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers (via the Miami Herald), Caroline Ward and Dan Freedman of the Houston Chronicle, and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
The Court could undermine long-standing restrictions on concealed carry in America’s major cities, leading to hundreds of thousands more guns on the streets of Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C.Like Stern and Epps, I think that it's likely that the Court will overturn the Second Circuit opinion and strike down the New York City rule. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Simes, Levin Simes Kaiser & Gornick LLP, San Francisco Will Jay Pirkey, Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, Los Angeles (Los Angeles Department of Water and Power);William J. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky observes that “distrust of the courts” seems to underlie several of the Court’s recent five-four decisions denying court access. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
  In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the Court “showed little enthusiasm . . . for reopening the cases of criminal defendants who lost out on good plea deals based on bad advice or bungling by their lawyers,” an observation echoed by Mike Sacks at the Huffington Post and Robert Barnes at the Washington Post. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the “Los Angeles Rams want the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 C-SPAN interviews Los Angeles Times correspondent David Savage, who says, among other things, that he was most caught off guard by the Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that "High court weighs child porn law; Justices seek to establish whether a tool to punish online purveyors of illegal pictures infringes on the 1st Amendment. [read post]