Search for: "Roberts v. King" Results 21 - 40 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this two-part series, I contended that the reading of the Obamacare statute offered by the plaintiffs in the important King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:20 pm
" Robert Weiner has a post titled "King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:12 pm
" And today at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Ilya Somin has a post titled "Federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:43 am by Tom Smith
” via www.nationalreview.com That takes care of the argument that Roberts joined the majority in order to write a narrower opinion, evidently. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Nicholas Bagley
In a significant setback for the Obama administration, the Supreme Court just agreed to review King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:20 pm
Adler has a lengthy post titled "The test to textualism in King v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:32 am
” - King Lear, Act V, Scene iii - I’m a little late to this one, but  I found  another great post from Robert Flach, The Wandering Tax Pro, titled 5 Times It Is Okay to Say “Never: Despite what the title of Sean Connery's last James Bond film recommends, there are times when you can say "never", especially when it comes to tax returns. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:56 am by Daily Record Staff
Brury, Robert Daniels, King Investments, LLC, Michael and Wanda King, and Maurice Lusby, appeal the Circuit Court for Calvert County’s dismissal of their complaint for declaratory judgment. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Jason Mazzone
King (exigent circumstances and the Fourth Amendment); Bullcoming v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
  Pear’s piece has provoked an ongoing avalanche of fervid reactions from both friends and foes of the King v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:47 am by Tony Mauro
In a letter dated today to King & Spalding chairman Robert Hays, NRA general counsel David Lehman said the firm's decision was "indefensible" but emphasized that the NRA's action in dropping King & Spalding is "not motivated by any position on the statute itself. [read post]
Recognizing that "tax credits" were a key component of health care reform enacted by Congress, six justices of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roberts, upheld application of the credits to federal exchanges, despite the statute's moments of "inartful... [read post]