Search for: "Rowley v. Rowley"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am
Eighth Circuit: IZM v Roesmount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schs, Independent Sch Dist No 1 70 IDELR 86 (8th Cir 7/14/17) Eighth Circuit ruled that a state statute regarding Braille instruction did not raise the bar for FAPE. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Bd. of Education v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:29 pm
Rowley, 455 U.S. 175, 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3038, 553 IDELR 656 (1982), the U. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 11:24 am
Ridley Sch Dist v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:22 pm
Recently, the Supreme Court clarified the FAPE standard in Endrew F by Joseph F v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
There was X v Hounslow,and Glasgow City Council v Mitchell. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:08 am
The Supreme Court clarifies that question.The case is Endrew F. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:32 pm
The high court clarified what FAPE means and how courts should apply the FAPE requirement.The decision in Endrew F by Joseph F v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:55 pm
I have previously questioned the reasoning of Master Rowley, when dealing with the new proportionality test in May v Wavell Group, that: “The proportionate amount of costs must inevitably be smaller for a case which concludes early than one which reaches a final hearing. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today on the case of Endrew F v Douglas County Sch Dist, #RE-1, Case No. 15-827. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
Rowley (the governing precedent, calling for a plan “reasonably calculated to provide educational benefit”) are opaque. [read post]
Argument preview: What level of educational benefit is “appropriate” for children with disabilities?
4 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:24 pm
A decision from Master Rowley in the Senior Courts Costs Office throws new confusion onto the issue of proportionality. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:33 am
The United States Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument for January 11, 2016 at 10:00 am for the special education case Endrew F. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:53 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday granted certiorari in the case of Endrew F. v Douglas County School District, No. 15- 827. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:12 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Bd. of Education v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm
Hot on the heels of Master Gordon-Saker’s proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) is another decision from the Senior Courts Costs Office, this time from Master Rowley in Dr Brian May v Wavell Group Plc. [read post]
